Friday, January 30, 2015

In The Great Gatsby, how does Fitzgerald demonstrate Myrtle Wilson's attempt to become a part of the upper class?

Myrtle Wilson sees Tom Buchanan as her ticket to the upper class.  She lives in the Valley of Ashes with her meek husband, George. When she sneaks off with Tom to an apartment he keeps for them, she acts superior, believing that she is already of a higher class because she is with Tom, and that eventually she will be his wife.


In Chapter II, Nick reluctantly goes along with Tom and Myrtle to a gathering in the apartment in New York.  Small details reveal her attitude: she lets four taxis go by before she picks the newest one. She stops and buys perfume and cold cream at a drugstore, items Tom undoubtedly paid for and which her husband would not be able to afford. She buys a dog with the same impulsivity.


In the apartment, Nick watches her supercilious actions:



“Mrs. Wilson had changed her costume some time before and was now attired in an elaborate afternoon dress of cream colored chiffon…with the influence of the dress her personality had also undergone a change. The intense vitality that h been so remarkable in the garage was converted into an impressive hauteur. Her laughter, her gestures, her assertions became more violently affected moment by moment.”



Later, she talks about the bellhop as if he is of a lower class than she is; then she ‘swept into the kitchen, implying a hundred chefs awaited her orders there.’


Myrtle believes herself to be upper class because she is with Tom, yet her words and actions reveal her ignorance.  She mispronounces ‘appendix’ as ‘appendictus’ and believes the latest celebrity gossip magazines are high-class reading. When Myrtle explains how she feels about her husband, her description is ‘violent and obscene.’


The apartment, which she thinks is so expensive and exclusive, is small and furnished with overly large furniture, making it cramped and awkward to navigate. However, Myrtle does not realize this.


Myrtle is trying to act how she believes an upper class woman would act, but she fails miserably. She merely comes off as cheap and tawdry.

How does McCullers use elements of the grotesque to create her central theme in Ballad of the Sad Cafe?

In Carson McCuller’s The Ballad of the Sad Cafe, there are several grotesque elements. One of the key elements is characterization. Miss Amelia is a grotesque character—she is over six feet tall and is man-like. Cousin Lymon is also an unconventional character—he is a hunchback and a misfit. However, he and Miss Amelia make the cafe work for a time, until he leaves her.


The setting in this novel is also considered grotesque. It is an isolated, impoverished area, where people who live there are suspicious of outsiders. At the end of the story, Miss Amelia is left alone, in a destroyed cafe in this small town, which causes her to ultimately withdraw. Both the setting and the depiction of the characters contribute to the theme of isolation that is present in this novella.

What does Jing-Mei's mother want for her daughter?

In Amy Tan’s story “Two Kinds,” Jing-mei’s mother wants her daughter to live the American Dream. She believes America is the land of endless opportunities. Specifically, she wants her daughter to be a prodigy. Unfortunately, her mother does not understand what a prodigy is. By definition, a prodigy is a person who has a natural, innate talent or area of expertise that it far above others, especially in children.



"Of course, you can be a prodigy, too," my mother told me when I was nine. "You can be best anything.”



In the beginning, both mother and daughter foster the prodigy idea. They spend hours deciding on Jing-mei's area of expertise. Should she be a ballerina, an actor, or a musician? The pair read magazines and watch television programs as they decide which talent Jing-mei should aspire to. Her mother believes her daughter can be the best at anything if she works hard and practices. Jing-mei has a vision of being the perfect child if only she can determine her area of expertise. They try a number of things before settling on the piano. Unfortunately, Jing-mei never practices enough to play well, and she definitely is not a child prodigy on the piano. This leads to a rift between the pair.



"Why don't you like me the way I am?" I cried. "I'm not a genius! I can't play the piano. And even if I


could, I wouldn't go on TV if you paid me a million dollars!"


My mother slapped me. "Who ask you to be genius?" she shouted. "Only ask you be your best. For you sake. You think I want you to be genius? Hnnh! What for! Who ask you!”



Jing-mei’s mother wants the best for her daughter but does not understand that success comes in many different forms.

Thursday, January 29, 2015

What role does superstition play in Riders to the Sea?

The people of the Aran Islands live by the sea, and the power of the sea in their lives has become a supernatural power that God uses to both reward (in the form of bountiful fish harvests) and punish the community (in the form of danger and death fighting the sea’s forces.) We in the sophisticated culture of the European and American civilization dismiss the beliefs of the Island people as “superstition” – witness the belief that a drowned man's ghostly visage can ride across the horizon on a pale horse – while most of the allusions are actually from the Bible. To call the beliefs of Mauyra and her daughters “superstitions” would be akin to calling the Christian rituals and beliefs “superstitious” also. Primitive people (that is, societies where geography or other circumstances have separated their lives from the larger communities) almost always concentrate their spiritual symbolism on natural phenomena that affect their daily lives -- the sun, volcanoes, winds, etc.  Riders to the Sea, in Synge’s hands, becomes a microcosm of all religious explanations for life’s circumstances.

Discuss the reactions of the citizens of Florence to the plague.

The Decameron by Giovanni Boccaccio preserves important information about the plague outbreak in 1348 in Florence, Italy. The first thing he mentions is that people wondered if the cause of the plague was a malign influence of the planets or God's punishment of Florence for the sinfulness of its people.


The first action the people take is attempts at prevention, specifically "keeping the city clear from filth, and excluding all suspected persons" as well as praying and conducting special processions to try to persuade God to intervene to prevent or halt the spread of the plague.


Next, doctors, including many women and many quacks, attempted to discover and promot various cures, but none were effective. People soon discovered that the plague spread not just by close contact with a sick person but even by contact with a sick person's discarded clothing or bedding.


Because of the ease of transmission of the plague, healthy people began avoiding the sick; Boccaccio states:



These accidents [transmission of plague from clothing to animals], and others of the like sort, occasioned various fears and devices amongst those people that survived, all tending to the same uncharitable and cruel end; which was to avoid the sick, and everything that had been near them; expecting by that means to save themselves.



The ensuing panic as the plague continued to spread caused people to react in several ways. One group, because they considered the plague impossible to avoid, indulged in every form of pleasure and debauchery, in anticipation of their inevitable demise. Others isolated themselves in their houses and followed various strict medical regimes and forms of asceticism. Others, including the ones who were the protagonists of the Decameron, left the city to escape the plague, often moving to remote villas in the countryside and isolating themselves as much as possible. Corpses were left out in front of houses, with the dead no longer being honored or given elaborate funerals because of the many people who regarded isolation as the only precaution that could guard against the plague.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Should Candy be fired from the ranch in Of Mice and Men? He can't work as well as the other men because he lost his hand but he would have nowhere...

This is a political question and the answer depends on broader ideological concepts about the role of the employer in a society. These are exactly the ideas Steinbeck means to call into question. What is the role of the employer? Do the ranch owners have a moral obligation to Candy? Clearly, they have profited from his labor for many years. They may feel in the clear with him because they compensated him with $250 (about $2,500 in today's money) for his lost hand, but obviously that isn't enough money for him to achieve financial independence or survive many years of old age.


Candy is deeply worried. Social Security was enacted a few years before the time of the novel, but domestics and farm workers were exempted from it, so Candy can't count on a pension. The question becomes ethical: especially in the absence of a government safety net, is a long-term employer under a moral obligation to take care of an aged employee? Clearly, as others have pointed out, Candy is doing useful work for the ranch at this time, so they are keeping him on. But is it fair to get rid of him once he can't work?


Our society trends in the direction of individualism against corporate responsibility toward the worker, and the same was true in the 1930s, which is why Steinbeck is writing the novel: he wants to critique the capitalist system. Certainly, part of the power of a novel, especially a great novel, is it's ability to cause us to empathize with its characters. While it is easy to make ideological statements, a novel about social justice, be it Uncle Tom's Cabin or Of Mice and Men, puts a human face on abstract principals. Up close and personal, I would argue that Steinbeck causes us to feel Candy's pain and to feel that a person who has faithfully worked for so long and so hard, and lost a hand in the process is entitled to be kept on and not fired--and one might venture to say, even offered a retirement pension. Firing him would be exceptionally cruel, given his age and lack of a hand: one could imagine he would not be able to compete successfully for another position. 

In To Kill a Mockingbird, someone was leaving gifts for the children in a hole in a tree. Who was leaving the gifts, and why were they leaving them?

Boo Radley is the person who has been leaving little gifts for Scout and Jem in the knot of the old tree. Boo Radley has been shut away in his house for a very long time. He does not come out to socialize with people, and he has sort of become the neighborhood bogeyman. Scout and Jem tell imaginative stories about Boo and who he supposedly is and what he supposedly has done. Boo, of course, is nothing like the stories at all, and Scout and Jem will come to realize this by the end of the novel. Boo leaves the gifts in the tree because it is his way of reaching out to Scout and Jem and making friends. It's his way of sharing a little bit of himself with the other two children, so they won't be so frightened of him and his house.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

How could A Doll's House be considered a modern drama?

Ibsen's A Doll's House was a landmark play of Social Realism. 


Prior to the opening of this drama, audiences viewed romantic vignettes that were offered as escapes, plays in which exciting romances and adventures took place. However, Ibsen greatly altered this expectation by introducing Social Realism into the Victorian theater. For, he focused upon the characters' roles in society, placing a searchlight upon such issues as personal independence and actions driven by conscience rather than social mores.


In A Doll's House, Ibsen examines the restrictions upon wives and husbands both. While Victorian women are allowed little domestic or financial freedom as they are subservient to their husbands; men, too, are trapped into roles where respect-earning behavior is demanded. But, the paradox of this society which demands such stringent adherence to roles is that there exists a false morality. For example, in Ibsen's play, Nora has stepped outside the boundaries of the role of Victorian wife by forging her father's signature on a loan so that her husband's health could be saved in Italy; similarly, because Torvald accepts his role as moral authority, he cannot forgive Nora her act of love; instead, he sees her forgery as a crime.


Nora and Torvald stand in contrast to Kristine and Krogstad, who both were made to act in certain ways in order to care for their families, also; nevertheless, they accept each other in their renewal of their relationship. But, Torvald cannot fully forgive Nora, and she can no longer be his doll. Likewise, Nora cannot forgive Torvald for his condemnation of her act of obtaining a loan falsely so that he would be saved from death by going to Italy and its warm climate. Therefore, Nora asserts herself and leaves Torvald and her children.


Henrik Isben examines what one interpretation holds as



...the irrepressible conflict of two different personalities which have founded themselves on two radically different estimates of reality. 



Certainly, A Doll's House is a modern play as it employs drama as a forum for social issues.

Please help me to find three examples of hyperbole in the Romeo and Juliet as well as three quotes that demonstrate loyalty.

Here are three examples of hyperbole (also called overstatement because it emphasizes truth through exaggeration):


After learning that he will be exiled from Verona for slaying Tybalt, Romeo says, "There is no world without Verona walls, / But purgatory, torture, hell itself" (3.3.18-19).  He means that to him, Verona is the world and to be anywhere else is to feel as though he is in hell. 


When Romeo watches Juliet on her balcony, he says that "The brightness of her cheek would shame those stars, / As daylight doth a lamp; her eyes in heaven / Would through the airy region stream so bright / That birds would sing and think it were not night" (2.2.19-23).  There are actually two examples of hyperbole in these lines.  First, Romeo says that Juliet's beauty seems to shine even brighter to him than the stars, just as the sun shines brighter than a lamp.  Second, that her eyes are so bright that the birds would think it is daytime and begin to sing, even though it is really night.


Here are three quotes that demonstrate loyalty:


Romeo is loyal to Juliet, his new (secret) wife; so much so that, when Tybalt comes to duel with him, he refuses to fight.  He says that he "love[s] [Tybalt] better than [Tybalt] canst devise," that he "tender[s] / [Tybalt's] name as dearly as [his] own [...]." (3.1.70.72-73).  Thus, he refuses to fight Tybalt, his wife's cousin, because he is loyal to her and to her family.  Even when Mercutio accuses him of behaving dishonorably, he remains loyal to her.


The nurse is loyal to Tybalt, at least immediately after his death, saying, "O Tybalt, Tybalt, the best friend I had!" (3.2.67).  Frankly, the nurse seems loyal to everyone, all at once sometimes!  She's very loyal to Juliet, and even Romeo at times, but she eventually agrees with the Capulets' in her advice to Juliet to marry Paris.


Just prior to this, however, the nurse does stick up, quite loyally, for Juliet when her father is berating her for her disobedience.  She cries out, "God in heaven bless her! / You are to blame, my lord, to rate her so" (3.5.176-177).  The nurse defends her charge, standing up for her when not even her own mother would.

Monday, January 26, 2015

In The Outsiders, why do you think Dally is so dependent on the switch blade in chapter 9?

Dallas is powerless on his own in chapter 9.  He is powerless physically, emotionally and in the face of authority.  Because of the fire in the church, one of Dally's arms is hurt, so he can only fight with one hand -- one hand that is made exponentially stronger with a knife.  


Dally needs to manipulate authority to get what he wants in chapter 9, and he can't do that on his own.  He can't get discharged from the hospital on his own, so he "talked the nurse into it with Two-Bit's switch" (Hinton 144).  


When Dallas and Ponyboy go back to the hospital to visit Johnny, Dallas' emotions get the better of him; he is both embarrassed to show them and doesn't know how to deal with what he's feeling.  When told Johnny is near death, Dallas threatens him with the knife: "We gotta see him [...] We're gonna see him and if you give me any static you'll end up on your own operatin' table" (147).  


Dallas' feelings of powerlessness are only made worse by Johnny's death; chapter 9 signifies the true end to Dally's innocence (if he had any left) and greatly foreshadows his downfall.

Sunday, January 25, 2015

What does the following quotation from Macbeth mean in modern English: "By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes"?

At the beginning of Act 4 in Macbeth, the witches are gathered in their lair, and soon Macbeth arrives to see them to get a new prophecy.  Just before he enters the scene, one of the witches says, "By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes."  According to ancient superstitions, any pain, tingling, or other bodily sensations that had no direct cause were thought to be supernatural signs of events to come.  So here, the witch feels a pricking in her thumb, which is a sign to her of some evil on its way.  She goes on to say "something wicked" referring to Macbeth himself, who is being guided by his greedy and ambitious intentions.  And then Macbeth does enter the lair, proving that the witch's premonition is correct.

Saturday, January 24, 2015

I need help on an assignment which requires that I write an essay comparing and contrasting the French and American Revolutions. The essay needs...

The people expressed their resentment towards the oppressive absolute monarchs by supporting the revolution in their countries. America stood against King George while France rejected King Louis XVI. The societies in both countries rallied against oppressive tax regimes instituted by the monarchs. However, the revolution in France was socially supported by a larger upper-class population as compared to the American Revolution.


Economically, the two revolutions were caused by oppressive taxation regimes enforced in attempts by the administration to deal with failing economies. For instance, France had emerged from the Seven Years War that was far too costly for the nation. The difference between the two revolutions was that France was in a worse situation economically compared to America prior to the onset of the revolution.


Politically, the two revolutions were similar because the people lacked representation in both countries. Power and control were vested in the absolute monarchy and nobility. The two revolutions resulted in the withdrawal of recognition accorded to titles of nobility and instead focused on equal representation. The difference between the two was American representation in the British parliament was limited while in France the people had no adequate representation. In France, administration and public policy were restricted to the monarchy and the clergy.

Friday, January 23, 2015

What is a significant major event in the book 'The Road' by American novelist Cormac McCarthy?

A significant major event in the book 'The Road' by American novelist Cormac McCarthy is the discovery by the man and his young son of a group of people who have resorted to cannibalism to survive. The two, in their journey, have happened upon a dilapidated house in the countryside. The father goes into the house to investigate if there is sustenance there that they can acquire – food and clothing, medicine, and such.


While in the house, the father hears a racket coming from downstairs, but he’s unsure of what this is all about. He pries open a floor door to peer down into the subterranean level of this house. What he sees shocks and reviles him.


Down below are human beings who are missing legs, arms and more. This is because the marauders who captured them are keeping them captive below as a food source-  as disgusting as this is. This is a powerful and repugnant scene in the novel. However, it is used to great effect by Cormac McCarthy to show how society has totally broken down.


Mankind has, in essence, turned on itself to survive. The author is showing that it is an “every man for himself” mentality. Common decency and morals are now a thing of the past as concerns a significant number of survivors who are now left in America. This major event in the novel, that cannibalism is now a reality, informs the reader that humankind has possibly reached the point of no return in its decadence.


This scene propels the novel forward in that the man now realizes that he and his son have to quickly get away from the desperate marauding bands that are about. They must get to the coast – their goal -  and see if there are any decent, moral, humane people left in America. The discovery of cannibalism spurs the father to want to protect his son even more. As a result, he will do whatever it takes to protect his son and give him at least some small chance of surviving in this post-apocalyptic world.

Who is Ben in "A Retrieved Reformation"?

Ben Price is Jimmy Valentine's nemesis. Ben is a tough, experienced, intelligent detective. O. Henry does not say that he is a police detective. Ben seems to be the kind of detective who worked for big private agencies like the famous Pinkerton National Detective Agency, founded in 1850. In O. Henry's day the federal government was not involved in protecting banks. Bankers had to hire their own security services. It wasn't until the U.S. Congress passed legislation creating federally guaranteed protection of bank deposits that the government got involved in protecting the banks through the FBI. Those were the days of famous gangsters like John Dillinger, Bonnie and Clyde, and Pretty Boy Floyd.


When Jimmy Valentine gets out of prison he goes to the rented room that has been kept for him by his pal Mike Dolan, who owns the building and runs the cafe on the ground floor.



He got his key and went upstairs, unlocking the door of a room at the rear. Everything was just as he had left it. There on the floor was still Ben Price's collar-button that had been torn from that eminent detective's shirt-band when they had overpowered Jimmy to arrest him.



It was Ben Price who arrested Jimmy and got him sent to prison for the "Springfield job" ten months or so earlier. When Jimmy gets his specially designed tools out of their hiding place, he commits three safecracking jobs in banks in Indiana. Naturally the banks call for help from the agencies they employ for protection.



The losses were now high enough to bring the matter up into Ben Price's class of work. By comparing notes, a remarkable similarity in the methods of the burglaries was noticed. Ben Price investigated the scenes of the robberies, and was heard to remark: “That's Dandy Jim Valentine's autograph. He's resumed business. 



By this time Jimmy has decided that he is getting too well known in the area. He decides to move to a different territory of operations. He chooses the town of Elmore in Arkansas and opens a shoe business as a "front," an occupation that will make him look like a respectable citizen. He also changes his name to Ralph Spencer. Quite unexpectedly, he falls in love at first sight with Annabel Adams, and he decides to go straight because he knows she would never have anything to do with a criminal. Furthermore, he finds that he is prospering in the shoe business and that he enjoys the straight life.


But Ben Price, his nemesis, traces him to Elmore and is waiting in the bank to arrest him for the three bank jobs he pulled in Indiana. When Jimmy feels compelled to open his suitcase and use his incriminating burglar tools to open the bank vault where the hysterical little girl has been accidentally trapped inside, he has to reveal the fact that he is a professional safecracker. It looks as if his reformation is destroyed. He will lose his beautiful fiancee, his business, and his new identity. He knows Ben is waiting for him and that he will get a heavy prison sentence. But Ben has been impressed by Jimmy's noble sacrifice. In one of O. Henry's famous surprise endings, Ben tells Jimmy:



“Guess you're mistaken, Mr. Spencer,” he said. “Don't believe I recognize you. Your buggy's waiting for you, ain't it?”



So Jimmy''s reformation is miraculously "retrieved." No doubt he will have a lot of explaining to do to Annabel and her father, but they will forgive him because of his heroic action and because, like Ben Price, they will feel assured that Jimmy is thoroughly and truly reformed.

`u = , v = ` Find `u*v`.

You need to evaluate the product of the vectors `u = u_x*i + u_y*j, v = v_x*i + v_y*j` , such that:


`u*v = u_x*v_x + u_y*v_y`


`u*v = (-4)*2 + 1*(-3)`


`u*v = -11`


Hence, evaluating the product of the vectors `u = u_x*i + u_y*j, v = v_x*i + v_y*j,u = <-4,1>, v = <2,-3>` , yields `u*v = -11.`

What is Fortunato's state of mind as Montresor walls in the entrance to the niche?

In Edgar Allan Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado," Montresor lures Fortunato into the catacombs. He uses the pretense of having acquired a "pipe of Amontillado" whose value he questions, and he plans to ask their mutual acquaintance, Luchesi, for his advice. As Montresor anticipates, Fortunato insists on inspecting the Amontillado himself because "Luchesi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry."


In addition to being prideful about his knowledge of wine and even helpful (there is nothing to suggest that Fortunato has any negative feelings towards Montresor), Fortunato is sick and plagued with a hacking cough. He's also intoxicated and becomes more so when Montresor gives him more alcohol to help mend his cough against the damp catacombs.


When Fortunato first steps into the niche, he is unsteady from intoxication and bewildered by the turn of events. Montresor's actions completely confuse him, and he trusted the man enough to follow him deep into the catacombs without suspicion. Montresor takes advantage of Fortunato's so-called stupid bewilderment to clasp him in fetters (irons) and to begin walling him within the niche. At this point, Fortunato's state of mind turns to fear and desperation, but to no avail.


Poe is a master at creating characters who represent the darker aspects of the human condition; in this case, Montresor is influenced by his desire for revenge as a result of Fortunato's "thousand injuries" against him and whatever insult pushed Montresor to plan murder. Poe amps the suspense of the situation by never explaining those injuries or insults -- so we are left to wonder if the punishment meted out by Montresor in any way fit the crime allegedly committed by Fortunato.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

How many families lost their homes during the Great Depression? How does this relate to Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis?

Your question has a fairly simple answer:  around two million people lost their homes in the Great Depression and became homeless.  This is an interesting question because it has more to do with the Great Depression itself than it does with the book Bud, Not Buddy.  The wording of your question can be tweaked a bit in order to provide the proper statistic.  For example, “families who lost their homes” can also be referred to as separate “homeless people.”  During the Great Depression, it is a common fact that two million people lost their homes in the United States.


Further, we can see the effects of homelessness in the Great Depression in Bud, Not Buddy in many ways.  These effects are especially apparent when Bud and Bugs visit a “town” Bud calls “Hooverville.”  Bud soon learns that there are many of these “cardboard jungles” all over the United States because these people do not have anywhere else to live.  We can also indirectly see the effect of homelessness in the Great Depression by observing the house called “Grand Calloway Station.”  This is the house where all of the band members live.  They all live in one house because this is the only way they can afford shelter in between gigs.

How did the impact of machine guns reflect the development of technology in World War I?

There were many examples of new technology used in World War I. One example of this was the development of the Browning machine gun. The United States used this weapon on the Western Front. Over 50,000 of these guns were produced.


There were other examples of new technology that were used in World War I. The Germans used chlorine gas, which, if inhaled, could be deadly. The Allies countered using gas masks. The Germans used the Zeppelin as a weapon in World War I. This airship could drop bombs on its targets. The first mobile howitzer was used in this war. This weapon could send a shell a long distance. The Germans also used the flamethrower. This weapon allowed a burning liquid to be used to attack its targets. The tank was also developed in World War I. Finally, the use of tracer ammunition allowed a pilot to see where his shots were going.


There were many examples of new technology used by both sides in World War I.

How did microscopes change our ideas about living things?

Microscopes are devices that allow us to view extremely small objects and features. A compound microscope is a common feature of school laboratories and is generally used to look at small features of leaves, animals, etc. 


Before the advent of microscopes, it was really tough to believe that extremely small and practically invisible (at least to our naked eye) organisms exist and that smaller parts make up larger organisms. It was only after we started using microscopes that we could confirm the existence of microorganisms such as bacteria, algae, viruses, etc. More powerful microscopes allowed us to view cells and their organelle and confirmed cell theory. Microscopic observations have also helped us distinguish between benign microbes and pathogens and helped us develop medicines.


Thus, our view of life at the smallest scale (nano and micro scales) has been completely revolutionized by the microscope.


Hope this helps.  

Illustrate how separation of power and check and balances work in the U.S. Government ?

Separation of powers and checks and balances are key parts of our plan of government under the Constitution. Separation of powers means that each branch has a different job to do, and no branch of government can do everything by itself. In our system, the legislative branch makes the laws. The executive branch is responsible for carrying out the laws. The judicial branch interprets the laws. No branch has enough power to do everything by itself.


Checks and balances mean the branches have the ability to control each other so no branch has too much power. For example, while the legislative branch passes laws, the executive branch, led by the president, can veto those laws. If a bill is vetoed, it doesn’t go into effect. However, the legislative branch, Congress, can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Congress. The judicial branch, our courts, can declare laws illegal or unconstitutional. This would prevent a law from staying in effect. The legislative branch can impeach members of the judicial and executive branch if they break laws or act inappropriately. Each branch has the ability to control the other branches under the system of checks and balances.

What lessons and values does Walter Cunningham Jr. teach Scout Finch throughout the novel To Kill A Mockingbird?

Scout learns several important lessons and values from her interactions with Walter Cunningham Jr. throughout the novel. At the beginning of the novel, Jem stops Scout from beating Walter up on the playground at school and invites Walter over for dinner. While Walter is eating dinner, he begins to pour syrup over his meal and Scout openly criticizes him. Calpurnia talks to Scout in the kitchen and explains the importance of showing respect to Walter and not judging him. She teaches Scout that everyone deserves to be respected, regardless of social class. Scout learns the importance of having manners and respecting others from Walter's visit.


In Chapter 23, Atticus explains the Cunninghams' family background to his children and tells them that the Cunninghams have integrity and morals. Scout learns that character is not associated with wealth. The fact that Walter Cunningham Jr. comes from a poor family does not mean that he is not a morally upright individual. Scout mentions that she was glad that she had defended Walter Cunningham Jr. on the first day of school after hearing that his relative initially supported Tom Robinson and that Walter came from a good family. Walter Cunningham Jr. indirectly teaches Scout the significance of being kind and helpful to others. Scout learns that her good deeds can have positive effects in the future and are not overlooked.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Please explain a humorous incident from "Raymond's Run."

There are a number of humorous incidents in “Raymond’s Run” by Toni Cade Bambara. When something is humorous it is comical, funny, or droll. When looking for a funny incident in the story, it is important to remember that what one person finds humorous, another may not.


The paragraph describing Mr. Pearson approaching Squeaky is humorous. When Bambara describes him, she provides an image of a tall, discombobulated self-important man.



Then here comes Mr. Pearson with his clipboard and his cards and pencils and whistles and safety pins and fifty million other things he’s always dropping all over the place with his clumsy self.



The author describes him as walking on stilts when she means he is extraordinarily tall. The reader gets a picture of a gangly man with a variety of items that he does not necessarily need for signing the entrants into the race. He drops those items as he hurries around on race day.  In essence, the author describes him as a clown-like character who the children used to call “Jack and the Beanstalk.”  


As you read the story, you may find another incident funny based on your personal sense of humor.

In the Old English poem "The Seafarer," what are the seafarer's responses to "harps," "rewards," "passion," and the other pleasures of life on land?

"The Seafarer" is one of the very few existing poems written in Old English. As with the Old English epic Beowulf, we don’t know the author or the precise date, since the work was transmitted orally until eventually being handwritten by Anglo-Saxon monks.


The poem’s speaker tells of his dangerous and difficult experiences on the cold and rough sea, comparing this to a life of ease on land. The central idea is that man, to satisfy the longings of his soul, must take such a difficult journey in his efforts to know God and follow (or find) his fate.


In the first half of the poem, the poet characterizes the sailor’s situation:



No harps ring in his heart, no rewards,


No passion for women, no worldly pleasures,


Nothing, only the ocean’s heave.



These lines express the idea that man must turn away from the ways of the world to seek God and spiritual fulfillment. The pleasures of civilization are many . . .



And yet my heart wanders away,


My soul roams with the sea, the whale’s


Home



He must go even if it means subjecting himself to the dangers of the open sea. Although the spiritual journey is treacherous, the seeker must press on regardless:



Thus the joys of God


Are fervent with life, where life itself


Fades quickly into the earth.


What is the orbital period (in years) of an asteroid whose average distance from the sun is 28 A. U.?

The orbital period is the time that it takes the asteroid to complete an orbit around the sun. To calculate the orbital period we use the third Kepler law. According to this law; for any body that orbits around the Sun, the square of its orbital period is proportional to the cube of the length of the semimajor axis of its elliptical orbit. This law can be written mathematically as follows:


(T^2)/(R^3) = constant


T, is the orbital period and R is the average distance to the Sun.


So, for any planet in the solar system (the earth for example), and the asteroid we can write the following equality:


(Ta^2)/(Ra^3) = (Te^2)/(Re^3)


Solving for the period of the asteroid, we have:


Ta^2 = (Te^2)(Ra^3)/(Re^3)


Given the values Te=1 year, Re=1 A.U. and Ra=28 A.U., we have:


Ta^2 = (1^2)(28^3)/(1^3)


Ta = sqrt (28^3) 


Ta = 148.16 years

Monday, January 19, 2015

Who was more at fault for both Simon's and Piggy's deaths? Jack or Ralph?

I can understand the dilemma in asking about Simon's death, but not Piggy's death.  Roger killed Piggy.  He's the guy that pushed the huge, heavy rock down the hill that smashed Piggy.  He's a member of Jack's band of merry men, so I blame Jack. He and Roger are bloodthirsty nut cases.  


Simon's death is a bit harder to pin down on any one guy.  Simon is trying to get back to the camp in order to tell the boys that the monster is nothing more than a dead body hanging in a tree.  Unfortunately, Simon comes back to the camp so dirty and crazed looking that the boys, in their frenzied state, think he is the beast. They beat him to death.  I would say that both Ralph and Jack deserve equal blame on that death.  Ralph thinks so anyway.  But if I have to pick one or the other, I still choose Jack.  He's a bloodthirsty nut case with no remorse.  At least Ralph shows remorse.  

In Chapter Two of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, how did Robert Louis Stevenson create suspense and tension?

As Robert Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde begins, the characters of Gabriel John Utterson, a lawyer, and Richard Enfield, a distant relative of the former and regular companion during long strolls, are discussing a strange and particularly disturbing event witnessed by the latter. Enfield describes the scene as follows:



“All at once, I saw two figures: one a little man who was stumping along eastward at a good walk, and the other a girl of maybe eight or ten who was running as hard as she was able down a cross street. Well, sir, the two ran into one another naturally enough at the corner; and then came the horrible part of the thing; for the man trampled calmly over the childs body and left her screaming on the ground. It sounds nothing to hear, but it was hellish to see. It wasnt like a man; it was like some damned Juggernaut.”



Thus begins Stevenson’s macabre tale of the respected physician Henry Jekyll and his alter-ego, Edward Hyde, the latter the perpetrator of the horrific scene Enfield describes. As the two men continue their stroll, Utterson questions Enfield more about the strange man and about the house to which Enfield was led by the stranger. The man’s name, Enfield replies, was “Hyde.” As Chapter Two, titled “Search for Mr. Hyde,” begins, then, the atmosphere has been established. A peculiar, oddly-postured man, known to few, has coldly assaulted a young girl, and readily handed over financial restitution in response to the demands of Enfield and the girl’s family. Utterson, however, is bewildered by the events described by Enfield, and Stevenson begins to build suspense by focusing on this barrister’s sudden change of routine, a routine the injection of suspense into which is heightened by the observation that Utterson lives alone:



 “That evening Mr. Utterson came home to his bachelor house in sombre spirits and sat down to dinner without relish. It was his custom of a Sunday, when this meal was over, to sit close by the fire, a volume of some dry divinity on his reading desk, until the clock of the neighbouring church rang out the hour of twelve, when he would go soberly and gratefully to bed. On this night however, as soon as the cloth was taken away, he took up a candle and went into his business room. There he opened his safe, took from the most private part of it a document endorsed on the envelope as Dr. Jekylls Will and sat down with a clouded brow to study its contents.”



The will to which Stevenson refers specifies Edward Hyde as the recipient of Henry Jekyll’s estate in the event of the latter’s disappearance—an event that apparently has transpired. The lawyer’s possession of his friend Dr. Jekyll’s will, with the prominence accorded Hyde therein, has become suddenly problematic, to say the least. Utterson’s realization that this violent, bizarre stranger named Edward Hyde at the center of the events described earlier that day by Enfield is the same as the individual named in Jekyll’s will is described by Stevenson as “there leaped up the sudden, definite presentment of a fiend.” Stevenson, then, is building suspense and tension through the revelation that a malevolent figure has appeared in the midst—a figure the identify of which is a mystery. Utterson, consequently, becomes determined to investigate this menacing figure.


Stevenson continues to build suspense through Utterson’s conversation with a medical colleague of Jekyll’s, Dr. Lanyon, and the two men, both close associates of Jekyll, mutually acknowledge that their friend has become increasingly scarce. What makes this conversation instrumental to the proceedings, though, is Lanyon’s observation of Jekyll as having begun “to go wrong, wrong in mind.” Utterson is determined to ferret out the identity of Hyde, and it becomes all-consuming. He lies awake in bed restlessly trying to reconcile the divergent personalities of Jekyll and Hyde. Utterson’s efforts soon lead to the desired encounter, but Stevenson injects tension into the proceedings, as the lawyer’s nighttime endeavor invariably involves the sound of approaching footsteps possibly attributed to a malevolent being:



“Mr. Utterson had been some minutes at his post, when he was aware of an odd light footstep drawing near. In the course of his nightly patrols, he had long grown accustomed to the quaint effect with which the footfalls of a single person, while he is still a great way off, suddenly spring out distinct from the vast hum and clatter of the city. Yet his attention had never before been so sharply and decisively arrested; and it was with a strong, superstitious prevision of success that he withdrew into the entry of the court.”



In the context of the story—the search for Mr. Hyde—Utterson’s nocturnal activities assume a greater level of tension. There is a sense of approaching danger, although the encounter with Hyde ends peaceably, but not before Utterson is able to get a good look at this stranger:



“[H]e had a displeasing smile, he had borne himself to the lawyer with a sort of murderous mixture of timidity and boldness, and he spoke with a husky, whispering and somewhat broken voice; all these were points against him, but not all of these together could explain the hitherto unknown disgust, loathing and fear with which Mr. Utterson regarded him.”



Stevenson still has quite a bit of story left to tell when this chapter ends. He has, however, ably introduced the reader to the character of Edward Hyde, while injecting into his narrative the possibility that the lawyer’s friend, Dr. Jekyll, may have been the victim of Hyde’s evil machinations. That the two men—Jekyll and Hyde—are one and the same cannot, of course, have occurred yet to Utterson, but the suspense surrounding the identity of Hyde and the whereabouts of Jekyll set the stage for the resolution to come.

Sunday, January 18, 2015

What started World War One and why?

There were many factors that led to the start of World War I. One of them was nationalism.  A wave of nationalism was sweeping through Europe in the early 1900s. Countries began to believe they were better than any other country. They believed they could do whatever they wanted, and they could beat any country in a war if that country tried to stop them from achieving their goals.


Another cause was imperialism. Germany got into the colonizing mode very late. By the time Germany was unified, almost all lands available for colonization were already gone. The only way Germany could get colonies was to attack countries that had them.


A third reason why World War I began was militarism. Countries began to build up their military strength. Usually when a country increases their military, they usually have plans to use it. As Germany built up its military, so did the other Allied countries.


Entangling alliances were another cause of the war. When countries formed these alliances, it created the possibility that a war between two countries could quickly escalate into a multi-nation war. When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, it led to a chain reaction where members of the Triple Alliance and members of the Triple Entente declared war on each other.


The event that sparked the start of World War I was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. Franz Ferdinand was supposed to be the next King of Austria-Hungary. When a group of Serbian nationals assassinated Franz Ferdinand, Austria-Hungary made a series of demands on Serbia. When Serbia couldn’t meet all of these demands, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. Russia then declared war on Austria-Hungary. This started the chain reaction of alliance members joining the war as one member of the Triple Alliance and one member of the Triple Entente declared war on each other.


Many factors led to the start of World War I. Most causes had been simmering for years while one cause was the spark that ignited the war.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

In Animal Farm, why did the animals prefer Mr. Pilkington over Mr. Frederick?

You can get a hint towards this answer in Chapter VIII of Animal Farm, (p. 36 in my copy of the book).  There, the narrator is discussing the relations between the animals and Mr. Frederick and Mr. Pilkington.  The narrator tells us that



The animals distrusted Pilkington, as a human being, but greatly preferred him to Frederick, whom they both feared and hated.



From this, we can see that the animals prefer Pilkington to Frederick because they only distrust Pilkington for being human whereas they also fear and hate Frederick as an individual.


But why is this?  The main reason is that Pilkington (who is meant to represent England), is a much more easy-going and friendly person than Frederick (who is meant to represent Hitler and Nazi Germany).  We are told on p. 15 that Frederick is “tough” and “shrewd” and that he is always involved in law suits with other people.  In other words, Frederick is a disagreeable person who seems to be much more menacing than Pilkington.  This refers to the way in which Hitler was much more aggressive in his anti-Soviet rhetoric and actions than England was.


The animals prefer Pilkington, then, because he is not aggressive, tough, and mean in the same way that Frederick is.  As you continue to read in Chapter VIII, however, you will find that the animals’ preferences are not always reflected in Napoleon’s policies towards the two humans.

Which elements of literature support the theme of innocence in The Catcher in the Rye?

The "elements of literature" include many different tools and techniques used by authors to tell a story in the most effective way. Elements of literature include using figures of speech, using symbolism, deciding on a particular point of view from which to tell the story, and using devices such as foreshadowing and flashbacks to organize the conflict and plot. The theme of innocence is most likely supported whenever Holden interacts with children and when flashbacks are used to expose the happy times of his childhood. For example, Holden notices a poor family walking by whose son was singing "If a body catch a body coming through the rye" and he says, "It made me feel not so depressed any more" (115). This suggests that innocence can bring peace.


Another example of Holden interacting with the innocence of life is when he walks around the Museum of Natural History with two young boys who a tell him school was out for the day. He responds,



"He was lying, sure as I'm alive, the little bastard. I didn't have anything to do, though, till old Phoebe showed up, so I helped them find the place where the mummies were" (203). 



Holden had a good time with the boys, but had they been adults, he probably would have called them phonies. But since they were innocent children, he hung out with them and had a good time. 


Finally, symbolism is also used to portray innocence and that can be seen through Phoebe, Holden's sister. She is the innocent reason that he stays to face his problems rather than running away like he imagined he would. She's the hope in the future and the innocence worth protecting for Holden. When he realizes that he would break her heart if he ran away, he finds a way to be a catcher in the rye. He realizes that he is happiest around innocent Phoebe. His moment of awakening is when she is riding around on the carousel in the park and he says the following:



". . . I got soaked anyway. I didn't care, though. I felt so damn happy all of a sudden, the way old Phoebe kept going around and around. I was damn near bawling, I felt so damn happy, if you want to know the truth" (213).


Friday, January 16, 2015

I am trying to write a thesis for an essay on free will in Macbeth. What could be three main ideas for the body paragraphs? These are the ideas I...

The question of whether Macbeth's tragic downfall is a result of his own actions or a result of fate or the prophecies given to him by the witches is definitely a matter of debate among readers and viewers. If you want to argue that Macbeth's fall is a result of his own actions, as it seems you do, you should be able to find plenty of evidence in the play to support your three main ideas.


You specifically asked about how to support the first main idea: Macbeth consciously chooses to listen to Lady Macbeth and allow her to influence his actions. In Act I, the letter that Macbeth sends to his wife when he is on his way home to Inverness after the battle is a useful starting point. From this letter, we can tell that Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are more like equal partners than what we might expect of an aristocratic couple at this time. Macbeth confides in his wife, revealing his encounter with the witches and their prophecy that he would be king. He must trust his wife to share this information with her. Further, he sends this information right away instead of waiting until he gets home, which may further indicate how important it is for her to know this and suggests that he may want his wife's help or advice. We might infer from Lady Macbeth's ability to persuade Macbeth to go through with murdering Duncan that Macbeth is used to consulting his wife and trusting in her opinion. Ultimately, he does look to her for guidance both before and after the murder. Remember that it is Lady Macbeth who has to go back and plant the daggers on the guards because Macbeth cannot bear to look on the crime scene again. He allows his wife to not only become involved but also to take the lead. It is important to contrast this, however, with the later murders. When Macbeth has Banquo and the Macduff family killed, he does not consult his wife, does not involve her or expect her to help him, and does not even want to tell her exactly what he is planning (though he does hint to her that he's planning something without her before the murder of Banquo). At this point, Macbeth is completely in control of his own actions and is no longer relying on the persuasion of his wife.


Regarding your final idea, it's important to remember that the witches' prophecies are vague. Even though they reveal that Macbeth will be king "hereafter," they never say that he must become king immediately or that he must murder the current king to gain the throne. Macbeth does choose to act quickly on the information given, and beyond the push given to him by his wife in Act I, Macbeth does seem to consciously choose to do whatever he thinks it takes to take the crown immediately. He will not wait for "chance to crown" him, as he says in Act I, scene iii.

In "The Monkey's Paw" how was foreshadowing used to hint at future events?

W.W. Jacobs' short story "The Monkey's Paw" is about an English family who come into possession of an Eastern "talisman" which destroys their lives. Foreshadowing is the use of clues and hints that suggest events that have yet to occur. There are at least four examples of foreshadowing in the story.


In the opening paragraph, Mr. White is described as a risk taker as he plays chess with his son Herbert. He regularly put "his king into such sharp and unnecessary perils..." Because of this character trait, he later takes the monkey's paw from the Sergeant-Major, despite warnings about its potential evil.


The Sergeant-Major foreshadows the tragic events to come as he explains about the first man who made wishes using the paw:



"The first man had his three wish, yes," was the reply; "I don't know what the first three wishes were, but the third was for death. That's how I got the paw."



Later, of course, the paw is responsible for the death of Herbert as he is killed in order to fulfill Mr. White's first wish.


More foreshadowing of impending doom is revealed in the final paragraph of Part I when Herbert imagines he sees "horrible" and "simian" faces in the fire. The next day Herbert meets his death while at work. When a representative of the company informs Mr. and Mrs. White of their son's death, he also brings 200 pounds, the precise amount Mr. White had wished for the night before.


The final bit of foreshadowing involves the way Herbert dies and his funeral. He was badly maimed when he got "caught in the machinery" so his body must have been terribly disfigured. He is buried two miles away from where the Whites live. Thus, when Mr. White wishes his son alive again he doesn't take into account the condition of the body and the distance from the cemetery. He eventually comes to the realization his reborn son will be a horrible monster and his last wish is for Herbert to go away as the living corpse knocks on the door.  

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

In The Odyssey, Odysseus considers stabbing the Cyclops. Why does he change his mind?

Odysseus changes his mind about stabbing Polyphemus in the liver because, if he kills the Cyclops, there will be no one to move the stone door from the mouth of the cave, and he and his men will die inside.  The stone is too large for even all of the men, working together, to move, and the Cyclops keeps decreasing their number by eating two of them for every meal.  


Therefore, Odysseus must come up with an alternative plan to escape the Cyclops, some way in which they can wound him and render him incapable of catching them but still leave him healthy enough to move the stone door so that they actually have a way out. This is why he decides to blind Polyphemus.  Losing his sight will make it more difficult for him to catch them, but he will still need (and be able) to move the stone away to let his animals out to pasture (or to get help for himself).  

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

In the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, what do the characters in the story think about Miss Maudie?

Jem, Dill, and particularly Scout generally adore Miss Maudie. She is like an aunt but they (Scout and Jem) clearly enjoy her company more than they do with Aunt Alexandra. Miss Maudie allows them to play anywhere in her yard as long as they don't kill the flowers. She makes cakes for them and when Jem and Dill are off doing "boys only" things, Scout goes to Miss Maudie: 



In summertime, twilights are long and peaceful. Often as not, Miss Maudie and I would sit silently on her porch, watching the sky go from yellow to pink as the sun went down, watching flights of martins sweep low over the neighborhood and disappear behind the schoolhouse rooftops. (Chapter 5) 



Scout discusses Miss Maudie at length in Chapter 5 and suggests that she is as much of a pal as an adult role model. This sums up how they feel about her: 



She had never told on us, had never played cat-and-mouse with us, she was not at all interested in our private lives. She was our friend. 



In Chapter 24, Aunt Alexandra gives Miss Maudie a silent "thank you" or nod of approval when she criticizes Mrs. Merriweather's racist hypocrisy. 


Atticus also admires and respects Miss Maudie for being open-minded and a decent role model for the children. She is also friends with Stephanie Crawford because that is who she stays with after her house burns down. In general, Miss Maudie is respected and liked or loved by the aforementioned people who are significant parts of her life. 

How do Momaday's reflections on the death of his grandmother help him communicate a message about his Kiowa culture?

Momaday is prompted to make a personal journey—and to write this book—after his grandmother Aho passes away. She had been his own last living link to the traditional ways of the Kiowa, their ancestors. He wants to visit her grave at Rainy Mountain, near the Wichita Range in southwestern Oklahoma. But he also wants to go back and trace the historic migration route of the Kiowa, from western Montana to South Dakota’s Black Hills and then to Oklahoma.



I wanted to see in reality what she had seen more perfectly in the mind’s eye, and [I] traveled fifteen hundred miles to begin my pilgrimage. (Introduction)



By doing so, and by weaving into his experience the stories and legends handed down through the generations, Momaday honors his past and all of those who have gone on before, including his grandmother. He can identify more with them now. He shows that their lives and their history matter. He also helps a new generation of readers better understand the Kiowa culture.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, why is Jem and Scout's perception of Atticus ironic?

At the beginning of Chapter 10, Scout laments her father's lack of talent and old age. She mentions that he is much older than her friends' parents, and he does nothing interesting. Scout and Jem both find their father to be boring and are ashamed of him. Scout says,



"Our father didn't do anything. He worked in an office, not a drugstore. Atticus did not drive a dump-truck for the county, he was not the sheriff, he did not farm, work in a garage, or do anything that could possibly arouse the admiration of anyone." (Lee 118)



She even comments on that fact that he has to wear glasses, which is never cool in the eyes of a child. They even consult Miss Maudie and ask her if Atticus can do anything. She tells them that he can play a Jew's Harp and is the best checker-player around. The children are unimpressed and are still ashamed of their father.


Later on in the chapter, a rabid dog named Tim Johnson is walking down the main road of Maycomb. When Sheriff Tate arrives, he calls over to Atticus and gives him his gun. Atticus reluctantly takes Sheriff Tate's rifle and shoots Tim Johnson, killing him in one shot. The children are amazed at their father's marksmanship abilities. Miss Maudie tells them that she forgot that Atticus was the best shot in Maycomb County, and he had the nickname Ol' One Shot Finch as a young man. Jem and Scout are in awe, and Scout can't wait to go to school and brag about her father's marksmanship abilities.


Their perception of their father is ironic because they think he is talentless and boring at the beginning of the chapter, when in reality, Atticus is the most talented marksman in all of Maycomb County. In the eyes of a child, being the best shot in the entire county is probably the coolest, most interesting skill an adult can possess.

Saturday, January 10, 2015

How wlll the nation's economy be improved by the modest proposal?

According to A Modest Proposal's narrator, Ireland's poor adults would be able to earn a living if they fattened and sold their one-year-old babies to the rich as gourmet food. The narrator then gives detailed calculations to show that doing this would be profitable for the poor, noting that it would cost a mother only two shilling to raise a "fat" baby for a year, including the cost of dressing it in rags. The baby could then be sold for 10 shillings, leaving the mother a profit of eight shillings. A "thrifty" mother could earn even more if she turned the skin of the baby into gloves or shoes. 


In addition, the poor would have "something of their own" (the babies) which could be seized to settle debts. Further, killing many of the poor at a year old would reduce the number of the impoverished children and adults needing to be supported by charity, which would free up the money to increase Ireland's wealth. Finally, the money earned from this trade would stay in Ireland, people would be encouraged to marry because of the profitable baby selling business, and more people would come to eat in the taverns if they knew they could purchase such a delicacy.


Swift meant for people to be horrified by his narrator's idea. The essay satirizes (uses humor and exaggeration) to expose the cruelty in treating people as if they have no value beyond how much money they are able to earn.

What literary devices are used in the poem "She Was a Phantom of Delight" by Wordsworth? Is there personification, alliteration, or imagery?

William Wordsworth uses literary devices such as alliteration, meter, etc. 


The main literary devices used throughout the poem are rhyme and meter. The lines of the poem consist of four feet with each foot containing an unstressed syllable followed by an stressed syllable; the meter is thus iambic tetrameter. The rhyme scheme is AABBCC, etc., a form referred to as couplets. Thus a full description of the metrical structure of the poem would be "iambic tetrameter couplets." Most of these couplets are end-stopped rather than enjambed.


The poem makes extensive use of simile, a figure of explicit comparison, as in the lines comparing her eyes and hair to twilight:



Her eyes as stars of Twilight fair;


Like Twilight's, too, her dusky hair;



Wordsworth also uses metaphor, comparing the woman of the poem implicitly to a phantom, apparition, and spirit without use of explicit comparison words such as "like" or "as."


The language tends to be quite abstract with little use of imagery other than the comparison of the woman to twilight; there is no actual description of her physical appearance.


The main rhetorical device of the poem is amplification, long lists which pile one element of praise or noble characteristic on top of another, as in:



The reason firm, the temperate will,


Endurance, foresight, strength, and skill


I need help with the theme of fear in the novel The Chrysailds.

For the theme of fear, I would first start by discussing Waknuk society itself.  The entire society operates based on fear.  They have a fear of change.  Not necessarily societal change (although the society is fairly stagnant), but of genetic change.  Waknuk society is terrified of allowing any genetic variation that is considered outside "normal."  That's crazy.  They obviously didn't pay attention in 7th grade biology class, because that's where students learn that the advantage of sexual reproduction is genetic diversity.  But I digress.  Anybody who is genetically different enough to stand out is either killed or banished from Waknuk society to the Fringes.  That's why Sophie is terrified of people discovering her extra toe.  


That theme of fear is a two way street.  Let's use David and his telepaths as an example.  He and his friends are fearful of being found out.  They don't want to wind up dead.  But the other side of the street is that the Waknuk's are fearful of David and his abilities.  They have a right to be fearful as well, because the Sealand woman tells David that it is more or less fate and destiny that David and his kind will see the destruction of "normal" humans.  

Friday, January 9, 2015

What's the difference between caste and class?

Class and caste are both social stratifications used to divide people into different groups within a society.


Class System


Class systems exist in practically all societies. In a class system, the dominant drivers behind the grouping of individuals are power and wealth. Classes are determined by the distribution of resources, not established by legal or religious reasons. Those within a certain class will live similar types of lives, sharing the same broad experiences, chances, and perspectives. While people are born into a specific class, mobility among classes is possibly (either upward or downward), if not always easy.


Caste System


The caste system exists predominantly in South Asia. Unlike class systems, the caste system is effectively a closed system with little to no chances for mobility. Caste is determined by religious and legal norms and is a mostly permanent status inherited at birth. Caste also has historically had real implications on the functioning of a society - caste is used to separate people by their function in society (merchant, king, warrior, servant, etc).

Thursday, January 8, 2015

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what are some coming of age experiences for Scout?

Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird covers about three years of Scout's young life starting at age 6. Coming-of-age stories (a bildungsroman) chronicle how a character journeys from innocence to maturity through specific experiences. First, Scout needs to learn not to fight everyone who provokes her. Next, she needs to become more of a lady by wearing dresses more often and behaving properly while in one. Finally, Scout loses a little bit of her innocence as she becomes more aware of adult situations such as rape and racism. By accomplishing these tasks, or by going through difficult situations, Scout successfully matures and comes-of-age.


On the first day of school, Scout is easily prone to pick fights or to defend herself verbally and physically. She gets into altercations with Walter Cunningham, Cecil Jacobs, and her cousin Francis. Atticus gives her advice to help her overcome her knee-jerk reactions to what people say or do:



"First of all, . . . if you can learn a simple trick, Scout, you'll get along a lot better with all kinds of folks. You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view--until you climb into his skin and walk around in it" (30).



This advice seems to help, but Scout still needs time to conform to it through daily practice. It's not easy for a little girl to hear that her dad is a "n****r lover" by kids who don't know what those words even mean. So not only must she learn not to react, but she learns that people can be racist and rude without provocation. The turning point for Scout's fighting days is after she fights with Francis at Christmas and Uncle Jack spanks her. She overhears her father say to Jack that he knows she's trying to do better and just to be more patient.


Then, the other issue to confront is the tomboy one. Scout runs around in overalls much of the summer and her Aunt thinks she should be more of a lady by wearing dresses. At one point, Scout tells Aunt Alexandra that she can't do anything in a dress; but, her aunt tells her that she shouldn't be doing anything that needs wearing pants. It isn't until after the Tom Robinson trial that Scout wears a dress to one of Aunt Alexandra's tea parties--something she never would have done earlier on.



"Aunt Alexandra looked across the room at me and smiled. . . I carefully picked up the tray and watched myself walk to Mrs. Merriweather. With my best company manners, I asked her if she would have some. After all, if Aunty could be a lady at a time like this, so could I" (237).



This passage above shows Scout conforming to parts of life that require dresses, but she continues to wear pants to play outside. She realizes that there's a time and place for everything.


Finally, the Tom Robinson case affected the whole Finch family, as well as the town, that there was no way for Scout to escape hearing the word rape. She first asks Calpurnia what it means, but Cal refers her to her father with that question. However, once she does ask, Atticus gives her a legal definition full of jargon that Scout won't understand. It isn't really until Scout hears the testimonies at the trial that she comes up with her own definition of rape:



". . . it wasn't rape if she let you, but she had to be eighteen--in Alabama, that is-- and Mayella was nineteen. Apparently you had to kick and holler, you had to be overpowered and stomped on, preferably knocked stone cold. If you were under eighteen, you didn't have to go through all this" (209).



This definition is based on what Scout hears at the trial and isn't explicit enough for her to really understand. Through it all, though, so many racist and discriminatory things are said and done that she sees her brother Jem lose faith in humanity. Scout is still a little too young to understand it all, but she knows that rape is bad enough to send a black man to jail for it, whether he did it or not.

How does Major's speech introduce the plot of the Animal Farm? Focus on the conflict introduced here that will dominate much of the novel.

Major begins with striking statements. First, he says that he will not be alive much longer. Next, he claims that he now understands the nature of life as well as any living being. Unfortunately, the nature of life (of the animals) is "miserable, laborious, and short." Animals live the lives of slaves. Major then proceeds to eliminate possible causes of this terrible existence. It is not the climate that causes their misery. Major concludes that man is responsible for this miserable life. He notes: 



Because nearly the whole of the produce of our labour is stolen from us by human beings. There, comrades, is the answer to all our problems. It is summed up in a single word—Man. Man is the only real enemy we have. Remove Man from the scene, and the root cause of hunger and overwork is abolished for ever. 



Therefore, the solution is clear. Remove man and his domination of the animals' lives, and their lives will be improved. The conflict is clear: animals vs. man. Major encourages the animals to rebel. Major repeats the simple notion of this conflict. "All men are enemies. All animals are comrades." Major dies, the animals rebel, and the plot is then driven by the animals' struggle not to repeat man's mistakes. 

How do you know Dill is a liar?

Dill Harris is Scout and Jem's imaginative friend from Meridian, who spends his summers at his Aunt Rachel's house in Maycomb County. Dill is notorious for his tall-tales and made up stories throughout the novel. Dill has a rather boring home life and his parents seem to ignore him. Many of the lies that Dill tells are to make his life seem more interesting than it really is and to impress Jem and Scout. There are several scenes throughout the novel that depict Dill telling lies, as well as scenes that show Scout and Jem catching him lying. In Chapter 4, Dill tells Jem and Scout that he met his father who was the president of the L & R Railroad and that he had a long pointed beard. After telling this lie, he walks by the Radley house and claims that he can "smell death," and that Scout was going to die in three days. The children do not believe his stories and in the next chapter while they are discussing what Boo Radley looks like Dill comments that Boo probably has a long beard by now. Scout says, "Like your daddy's?" and Dill forgets that he lied about what his father looked like. Dill says, "He ain't got a beard, he----" and Scout yells "Uh huh, caughtcha" because she has just caught Dill in his own lie. (Lee 63) Scout elaborates on Dill's ability to lie by saying,



"Dill Harris could tell the biggest ones I ever heard. Among other things, he had been up in a mail plane seventeen times, he had been to Nova Scotia, he had seen an elephant, and his granddaddy was Brigadier General Joe Wheeler and left him his sword." (Lee 63)


Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Need help thinking of an essay topic. Prompt is to find a common theme within American literature (authors below) and compare two texts in the...

There are a lot of themes present in American literature.  For your prompt, I recommend staying fairly broad in your theme choice.  That will give you a lot of "wiggle" room to choose different authors.  You want that, because the list of authors that you provided spans hundreds of years worth of American literature.  


I would have a strong desire to pick a theme related to nature and the importance of nature to American authors and their stories.  That would allow you to use Bradford's Plymouth Plantation. More importantly though, it allows you use any of the romantic and transcendentalist authors that are listed there.  Irving would top my list, because some of his descriptions of nature in "Rip Van Winkle" are gorgeous.  Emerson and Thoreau are good choices too, but I find them dry reads.  Lastly, you could use the early Native American literature that you listed.  Their entire society and religion is based on a harmonious relationship with nature. 


A different theme would be the importance of logical thought.  For that you could compare writings of Paine, Jefferson, and Franklin.  


There is a lot that you could do with Poe and Hawthorne too.  Both authors tend to thematically focus on death, revenge, and guilt.  What might be nice for you regarding those two authors is that they wrote a lot of short stories on those themes, so you could have a lot of different examples.  You might be able to work in some Dickinson stuff here too.  She has a lot of poems about death. 


You could focus on a theme of God and religion.  Bradstreet and Bradford are great for that.  Their Puritan values are always at the forefront of their writing.

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

In "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge," what is the impact of the title when it says "an occurrence"? In what ways might the incident be considered...

The title of Ambrose Bierce's short story "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" is an understatement that belies how profound the subject matter of the story is. The "occurrence" is the hanging of a Confederate civilian operative by the Union Army. Obviously a death under any circumstances is a profound topic; life is precious, and death by hanging is particularly fraught with emotion, certainly for the one being hanged, and also for anyone else who cares for the person. Even those carrying out the hanging cannot remain unmoved by the process. 


In another sense, though, the word "occurrence" indicates that the event is somewhat routine, somewhat unremarkable. And in the context of the American Civil War, an event such as this would be just one of many, many horrific scenes that played out for the four years of the conflict. More American soldiers died in the Civil War than have died in any other armed conflict America has participated in. Over 620,000 soldiers died; this single death of a civilian operative, then, becomes simply an "occurrence." 


In another sense, the word "occurrence" in the title is ambiguous. What event does the title refer to? The obvious answer, which is reinforced by the last sentence of the story, is that it refers to the hanging of Peyton Farquhar. But there are two other "occurrences" that might be the subject of the title. First, something happened at Owl Creek bridge before the hanging. Farquhar attempted to destroy the bridge in order to keep the Union Army from advancing across it into Southern territory. As part of this effort, he planned to "elude the picket post" and "get the better of the sentinel." Since he referred to himself as "a student of hanging," it's possible Farquhar attempted to hang or succeeded in hanging the sentinel from Owl Creek bridge. Whatever Farquhar managed to accomplish was the "occurrence" that led to his eventual hanging and is therefore arguably the more important "occurrence" in the story. 


The other "occurrence" that could be referred to in the title is the imagined "occurrence" of Farquhar's escape. Taking up the last half of the story, the miraculous survival tale is a more noteworthy event than the hanging was, if it had been real. Of course, it all happens in Farquhar's mind in the split second before he loses his life. The detailed descriptions and developing suspense in this section make it the most memorable part of the story. The most profound message the story relays is also found in this section. That a person could live out such a seemingly realistic scenario in just a second or two underscores how precious life is and how one hangs onto life and hangs onto hope until the very end. 


The title of this story uses understatement to produce a profound effect on the reader, causing him or her to contemplate the preciousness of life.

Monday, January 5, 2015

What words or phrases evoke emotion in the audience?

Since you don't specify a work, I'll speak generally about how words and phrases evoke emotion in an audience.


First, know that writers are using appeals to pathos when they attempt to evoke emotion from their audiences. So, writers have to consider what their larger message is and who their audience consists of in order to construct their messages effectively -- this is true of fiction and nonfiction.


For example, if I'm writing a novel, and I want to heighten my readers' suspicion of a character, I will use adjectives that cast that character in a suspicious light, such as "sly" or "manipulative." I also will manipulate narrative structure, perhaps using narrative breaks to my advantage, cutting scenes and ending chapters at climactic moments to build suspense and curiosity about the character.


Nonfiction works similarly, with writers choosing to use evidence and examples to pull at their audiences' emotions. If I am writing a human interest story about someone seeking refugee status, and I want my readers to feel sympathy and empathy for the person, I will include information that paints them in a positive light, that establishes them as someone my readers can relate to, and that establishes they should be granted refugee status.


As a final example, consider the following two sentences. Pay attention to how the use of contrast words ("but" and "though"), and the arrangement of the information, yields different reactions to readers:


"Your performance on the end-of-year project is solid, but your public speaking skills are poor."


"Your performance on the end-of-year project is solid; your public speaking skills can be improved, though."


Notice the difference? Imagine you're the worker receiving these evaluations - which version will bother you the least?


Your question is broad, so I hope this response is helpful. Essentially, know that words can evoke an array of emotions, and every aspect of the written product, from word choice to narrative structure, contributes to this process.

Saturday, January 3, 2015

In Lord Of The Flies, which qualities make Jack a hero?

A hero is defined as someone who is admired or idealized for courage, exceptional achievements or noble qualities. The question is, does Jack meet any of the requirements to make him a hero? Let's look at each aspect and see if he measures up.


Courage. Jack seems to possess some courage in the sense that he is willing to venture into the unknown to find prey, to hunt, albeit in the company of others. However, when he has the first opportunity to kill a living thing, he lacks the courage to strike, as illustrated in the follwing extract:



There came a pause, a hiatus, the pig continued to scream and the creepers to jerk, and the blade continued to flash at the end of a bony arm.


... Jack’s face was white under the freckles. He noticed that he still held the knife aloft and brought his arm down replacing the blade in the sheath. Then they all three laughed ashamedly and began to climb back to the track...



He makes the excuse that he was looking for a place to stab, but it was the thought of killing which overwhelmed him and he lacked the heart to carry it through. This embarrassment, however, does not deter him and he is later successful at achieving his goal. The question arises whether we should actually consider if Jack's inner savagery was what ovewhelmed him instead of sheer courage. His desire to hunt was not borne from a noble purpose to find food so that everyone could eat. There was more than enough edible vegetation on the island for the boys to survive. He wanted to have fun and, furthermore, exercise his bloodlust, dominance and savagery.


Furthermore, Jack's bravery is offset by the fact that he bullies Piggy, who is weak and vulnerable. He literally does not 'pick on one his own size' but targets someone he knows cannot retaliate. Although he is involved in confrontations with Ralph, these are emotional incidents, spurred by anger and frustration. In the final chapters, he employs the boys to hunt Ralph down since he needs them because he lacks the courage to do so alone. Therefore, all things considere, Jack falls well short in this regard.


Except for hunting and killing a pig, there is nothing exceptional about what Jack has done. His desire was selfish and self-serving. Although the boys at one point showed their admiration for him when he apologised to Ralph for allowing the signal fire to die when a ship passed in the distance, there was nothing significant and memorable about much else he did. His hunters followed his instructions because, firstly, he had been their leader from the beginning since he was head of the choir and secondly, they shared his sentiment. They wanted to enjoy their freedom and do much as they pleased, which was to hunt instead of being bogged down by rules and responsibilties as Ralph and Piggy demanded. In this regard then, Jack also failed.


Finally, Jack lacks noble qualities. In fact, his actions speak only of savagery and malice. He intentionally sets out to kill pigs to satisfy his lust for blood. He hides his identity underneath a painted face and assumes a new persona, he bullies and hurts Piggy, steals his spectacles, imprisons the twins against their will, hunts Ralph with the assistance of others, does not care much about rescue, just wants to have fun, refuses to take responsibility for tasks which are meaningful such as building shelters and taking care of the signal fire, encourages others to kill and hurt. These are definitely not noble attributes.


So, all in all, Jack Merridew is definitely not a hero. 

Friday, January 2, 2015

Explain why Taft’s policies offended progressives, including Roosevelt.

President Theodore Roosevelt appointed William Howard Taft as his war secretary. He declined to run for reelection and supported Taft for the presidency. Taft won the election, against the Democrat William Jennings Bryan.


Progressives who had supported Theodore Roosevelt for the presidency did the same for Taft. They believed that he would continue supporting the progressive agenda supported by his predecessor. However, they were disappointed when during his presidency they noticed he was a conservative.


Taft as president failed to appoint reformers from the progressive side of the republicans to his cabinet. He was uncooperative of the progressive agenda and supported legislation deemed retrogressive by the progressives. This was observed after Taft supported the Payne-Aldrich Tariff, which did not revise tariff rates to the level expected by progressives. In this regard, Taft was seen to be supporting big business against the small man, an issue of discontent among the progressives.


His relationship with Roosevelt soured when he relieved Gifford Pinchot from his duties as head of the Bureau of Forestry. Pinchot was a friend of Roosevelt and an ardent progressive reformer. In summary, Taft offended the progressives and his predecessor because of his alignment and support of the conservative agenda.

How does Norman Bowie prove that Kantian ethics is very much a practical one for business? How does Bowie show real world importance of Kant's...

According to Kantianism, the good of an action should be based on its intentions and not its consequences. An individual, performing good acts should do so not because of some reward but because performing the good act is their duty. Kant distinguished duty into two, hypothetical and categorical duties. Hypothetical duties refer to things we do so we can achieve something else. Categorical duties refer to actions that we undertake, bound by rational thinking. It is the categorical duties that form the basic principles of Kantianism ethics.


Bowie demonstrated the practicality of Kantianism ethics by pointing to three aspects;


The self-defeating nature of immoral actions


To determine the morality behind an action a test on the principle guiding that particular action should be observed. This would be achieved by determining if the principle can be applied universally without contradiction or not. If the principle cannot be applied universally without contradiction, then the action is morally wrong. For instance, when businesses make additional demands on negotiated contracts, it shows that the business had no intention of abiding by the contract in the first place. According to categorical duties, if the principle of breaking contracts is universally applied then contracts would be deemed none existence because the parties are not obliged to honor the terms.


Treating stakeholders as persons


Kant asserted that dignity acquired by human beings through reason is valuable beyond price. Thus, during human interaction, people should ensure they treat each other not as a means but an end. In business relationships, the people should not be deceived or coerced instead, they should be given room to grow their human capacities.


The business firm as a moral community


According to Kant, the members of a business organization should develop rules that they can support. This builds the sense of ownership by the members towards the rules and ensures that they are subject to the same. Thus, such a community would foster respect among its members and ensure a moral relationship is developed.

What are the main characteristics of Paul Durcan's poetry?

Paul Durcan is an award-winning contemporary Irish poet with a dark past. He refers to poetry as a source of entertainment, and makes use of humor in most of his work. This is an unpopular opinion in the world of poetry, as many people consider it a serious art form and do not like it being described with so frivolous a word as "entertainment." His work tends to be satirical, making fun of politics and hypocrites in Ireland. He uses rich color imagery in his poetry, often claiming to be inspired by specific paintings or artists. He also uses metaphors that his readers find strange and critics refer to as "surreal" or in the genre of "magical realism." He uses various religious allusions in his poetry as well, including prayers or references to religious figures.

Make a claim about Percy Jackson and support it with text-based evidence, specifically chapters 11-13.

In Riordan's Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief, Percy is on a quest with Annabeth and Grover. There are many things that might be said about Percy, but particularly in these chapters (11-13), certain qualities of Percy stand out. Percy's curiosity and boldness are driving characteristics that define his personality. At the start of Chapter 11, Annabeth is mad at Percy for taking such bold chances and risking her chance to have a quest. Later, he stays longer at Aunt Em's because he is curious, despite his friends suggesting that they leave.


In Chapter 13, when they visit the St. Louis Gateway Arch and the woman and her dog transform into the mother of monsters and a chimera, Percy must fight back. When he loses his sword in a hole and Echidna taunts him, saying if he was a real hero, he'd go after it, he leaps from the structure to do so. His personality, which combines curiosity and boldness causes him to take incredible risks that endanger him and his friends.